{"id":2783,"date":"2016-06-20T14:07:00","date_gmt":"2016-06-20T14:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/?p=2783"},"modified":"2016-06-20T14:07:00","modified_gmt":"2016-06-20T14:07:00","slug":"week-4-reproducibility-of-script-based-workflows","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/workflow-reproducibility\/week-4-reproducibility-of-script-based-workflows\/","title":{"rendered":"Week 4: Reproducibility of Script-Based Workflows"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
Week four consisted of handling some difficulties with running queries and suggesting non-Prolog\/Datalog queries.<\/p>\n
The first half of week, I got problem\u00a0in running queries because Logic Programming and Deductive Database system for Unix and Windows was not installed properly. After installation of XSB (Prolog programming language) was completed, I started creating queries against the YW model\u00a0and focused on various kind of\u00a0queries that we might \u00a0want to ask of the LIGO.<\/p>\n
The second half of week, we had a quick review of YN-NW demo script in Provenance week 2016 and discussed about setting up the environment to run to\u00a0yw-noworkflow images at Docker Hub, some ideas of generating\u00a0YW and NW facts to be exported as CSV files\u00a0using SQL queries instead of Prolog\/Datalog queries\u00a0such as tricky parameterized SQL.<\/p>\n
Next week, I\u2019ll\u00a0try to implement the demo queries (YW*NW) and check which one is easy or hard to be done in SQLite.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Week four consisted of handling some difficulties with running queries and suggesting non-Prolog\/Datalog queries. The first half of week, I got problem\u00a0in running queries because Logic Programming and Deductive Database system for Unix and Windows was not installed properly. After installation of XSB (Prolog programming language) was completed, I Continue reading Week 4: Reproducibility of Script-Based Workflows<\/span>